Show simple item record

dc.creatorRoussell, Aaron
dc.description.abstractAmerican federal and state laws present marijuana as a dangerous substance requiring coercive control and forbid private citizens from possessing, selling, or growing it. The differences between marijuana and hemp--a similar but uncontrolled substance in the United States--remain largely social and legal, rather than chemical. These complications present conceptual and practical difficulties for the law, which is structured around neat, mutually exclusive categories. More practically, current forensic tests are incapable of discerning hemp from marijuana because of this legal confusion. This paper investigates the conflicting social, scientific, and legal understandings of marijuana and the potential practical implications of its legal status.en_US
dc.publisherAlbany Law Reviewen_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
dc.subjectMarijuana, Cannabis sativa, Law & society, Drug control
dc.titleThe Forensic Identification of Marijuana: Suspicion, Moral Danger, and the Creation of Non-Psychoactive THC
dc.description.citationRoussell, A. (2012). The forensic identification of marijuana: Suspicion, moral danger, and the creation of non-psychoactive THC. Albany Law Journal of Science and Technology, 22, 103-131.

Files in this item


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Roussell, Aaron
    This collection contains scholarly work by Aaron Roussell, Ph.D. and Assistant Professor in the Department of Criminal Justice and Criminology at Washington State University.

Show simple item record

Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License