Show simple item record

dc.creatorAhlstrom, Richard Van Ness
dc.date.accessioned2010-12-13T17:05:36Z
dc.date.available2010-12-13T17:05:36Z
dc.date.issued1/1/1985 0:00
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/2376/2677
dc.description.abstractA comparative approach to analysis of the body of tree-ring data from prehistoric sites in the American Southwest provides information on patterns of wood use, the effectiveness of interpretive methods, and culture history. Requisite to this approach is an interpretive framework developed since the 1920s by archaeologist versed in tree-ring analysis. Central to this scheme is indirect dating, by means of which dates derived from biological events of tree growth are applied to progressively more remote events in human history. A new contribution to this framework is an interpretive model that focuses on the shape of tree-ring date distributions. The framework guides re-interpretation of tree-ring data from sites categorized as mogollon 2 through 4, Basket maker III, Pueblo I, Pueblo II, Chaco, Pueblo III, Western Pueblo, Rio Grande, and Pueblo V, and from late pithouses and miscellaneous kivas. Coverage is relatively comprehensive for pithouse sites, Pueblo I sites, and kivas, but selective for post-Pueblo. Interpretations assign dates to construction and repair events, identify data from deadwood and from eroded, stockpile, and reuses beams, demonstrate the usefulness of detailed provenience information on individual tree-ring samples, and evaluate tree-ring data for reconstructing structure and site histories.The potential contribution to culture history of the corpus of tree-ring dated events is illustrated through discussion of 213 dated pitstructures. This body of data also contributes to knowledge of past wood use and to understanding of interpretive methods. Thus, dates from firewood samples tend to predate hearth use dates, "v" dates are close or equal to cutting dates, and "++" dates are useful though imperfect indicators of deadwood use. Construction-repair intervals indicate that pithouses typically survived for less than 20 years, no such limitations applies to divas. A sample of 20 or more dates is usually adequate for dating pitstructure, as the sample falls below this level, unless patterning is clearcut, dating confidence decreases. Patterning in date distributions suggests that many sites were abandoned within a decade or two after their latest tree-ring date.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Anthropology, University of Arizonaen_US
dc.language.isoEnglish
dc.rightsIn copyright
dc.rightsopenAccess
dc.rights.urihttp://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/
dc.rights.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/accessRights/OpenAccess
dc.subjectCedar Mesa (San Juan County, Utah)en_US
dc.subjectPit houses--Southwest, Newen_US
dc.subjectMogollon Pit housesen_US
dc.subjectPit houses--Architectureen_US
dc.subjectKivasen_US
dc.subjectHearth analysisen_US
dc.subjectFirewood analysisen_US
dc.subjectBasketmaker IIIen_US
dc.subjectPueblo Ien_US
dc.subjectPueblo IIen_US
dc.subjectChacoanen_US
dc.subjectPueblo IIIen_US
dc.subjectPueblo Ven_US
dc.titleThe interpretation of archaeological tree-ring datesen_US
dc.typeElectronic Thesis or Dissertationen_US
dc.typeTexten_US
dc.description.citationAhlstrom, Richard Van Ness, The interpretation of archaeological tree-ring dates, 1985


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

  • Cedar Mesa Research Materials
    This collection includes theses, dissertations, publications, presentations, and other research materials related to the Cedar Mesa Project managed by William (Bill) Lipe and R.G. Matson.

Show simple item record